Monday, October 8, 2012

Reviving the Image of Columbus or What I Celebrate on Columbus Day



Today seems to be the day when everyone who ever took World History 101 or had American History in High School comes out to play the social critic. Columbus Day is the perfect day for post-colonialists who have read a lot of theory to step up to the bat and pretend to know something about history. The problem with applying such meta-theoretical perspectives as post-colonialism is that such applications obscure the people of the past, Columbus in this case, and prevent modern audiences from ever understanding them as they saw themselves. This is not to draw attention away from the rape and pillage of the Caribbean which Columbus oversaw, but to properly contextualize it.

The tendency of post-colonial amateurs is to isolate what Columbus did once he came to America and forget that the process of arriving did not happen automatically. Post-colonialism obscures all of Columbus’ virtue behind his manifold vices. His virtue lies in the fact that he stepped out beyond the parameters of defined existence and looked for something beyond the known. The intellectual and physical bravery of Columbus is rare in the modern world and particularly rare in the academy, which, if we measured it metaphorically against Columbus, would have burned its ships before sailing or at best stuck close to the shores of the Mediterranean and remained a Genoese trader for life. Such is the attitude in our institutions of ‘learning.’

Imagine for instance if Columbus had been possessed of a mind that was afraid of falling off of the side of the earth, of stepping out beyond the approved dogma of the collective. Such an individual would never have left Genoa, much less had the audacity to try selling his plan to the crowned heads of two of the world’s most powerful monarchies. Would such a mind have ever risked life and limb to sail toward something unknown in search of riches which were, according to the accepted nautical norms of his day only available by sailing east or bartering with the Ottoman Turks?

It is OK to teach children that such an individual was courageous and that they should strive to embody the ideal of courage. There is nothing wrong with teaching children that cultural ideals exist and that they should live their lives to embody those ideals. When I speak of ideals, I mean ideals which humans can embody such as courage, in this case. This is radical or insane, I understand, in a world that has no ideals i.e. a post-colonial, neo-Marxist world.

Eventually, children should be clued in to the fact that the raping and pillaging happened. Not to destroy the image of Columbus for the sake of destroying an image and showing that “humans are fundamentally flawed” but to show that Columbus held ideas which were non-objective and irrational, such as the moral superiority of European Christians. This will also show them that non-objective and irrational ideas lead people to commit savage acts of barbarism and that such ideas cannot form the permanent basis of civilization without destroying it. Columbus’ real vices were the bad ideas he had about civilization, not the barbarous acts he committed in Hispaniola.

Columbus’ actions in the new world are a classic example of one collective oppressing another and should provide us with evidence that the best moments in human history have been the achievements of daring and bold individuals not collective actions. It should also show us that people who cling to the collective, which Columbus did with regard to religion but not nautical science, are only going to be products of their era and are what Ayn Rand, the novelist, calls ‘social ballast.’ Post-colonialists are also not keen on mentioning another facet of Columbus’ life: the fact that his mismanagement of the new world got him thrown in prison and that he more or less died in poverty.

Columbus’ legacy is indeed a mixed one, but there is something to be celebrated on Columbus Day – the joyous and triumphant individual achieving success in spite of tradition.  Post-colonial theorists should hold their theory in for a few minutes and attempt to understand Columbus’ virtues before running amuck in their attempt to list his vices.

No comments:

Post a Comment